Recently a mold of West examinations have been completed and commented on. This article will think for their divergence.

The theme of this essay is the language of reform and opening forty years. According to past ways, Beijing essay topic has two options, one of which is to write an argumentative political affairs related or narrative, another topic is relatively neutral topic, usually imagine narrative or text. However, this is generally not the essay topic, the topic is said to people is to fight back entrance to the topic on the reform and opening up, specially the two optional subject this time is all set to become a mode of reform and opening-related, namely narrative: in the reform and opening up in the story of an ordinary person, and argumentative: write four decades of reform and opening. My topic is naturally argumentative. While I was in high school writing narrative writing is very powerful, but politically relevant, I really have no idea, also edited out - of you have to see, I'm not good at holding people's flattering angle. I have to say, if I won the people, then the next step is certainly to be fiercely fell to him.

My topic is "On" governing the country "", the article will be sent to the site up within a few days, since I believe it is well written, and these days I will modify polish it. I choose this topic is given from two to three six-sentence position as expanded writing. Topics are as follows:

I chose which 2,3,4 sentence. The main point is that "revolution is not successful, we need to strive." The beginning of the first to identify a successful reform and opening up, and as I said above, holding over, it's time fell. First refers to the second sentence, the distribution of social wealth for the present stage of variations of the deployment discussed, demonstrated by the social redistribution of social wealth more evenly distributed reasonably be solved. Then the next paragraph referring to the third sentence, reaffirmed the reform and opening up to the people to bring the material abundance, leads people to take the needs of today and the status of China's cultural industry for spiritual nourishment. Brief overview of the development of the cultural industry is currently affected by the economic attraction, the lack of true feelings and feelings, and the lack of government departments to perform their duties now. Proof in the current construction of cultural industry is in need of reform. Finally, the fourth sentence quoted Lu Xun's words proved to solve the above problems need to pay a lot, the final argument central point: revolution is not successful, we need to strive.

I'm writing this, and finally got 38 points, the highest score ever. I remember writing a narrative up to a high of 35. While another student this election is narrative, got 39.5. I read three times. Read the first time that the content is really very simple, after all, is a narrative, 700 words content is difficult to give people the feeling of the contents of long duration. And I did not find anything particularly surprising points, 39 points just seems to think much. Followed by a second and third look at a few days, yesterday. Before commenting essay I read it, read it carefully. Content is the conflict between a young boy with his parents. At the beginning of reform and opening up, Shenzhen Venture lad wants to go, but the father does not agree, he took himself to lifetime employment in state-owned enterprises - is indeed the case at the time, into the equivalent of state-owned enterprises have a secure job, this is a very deep-rooted and widespread idea. However, the then state-owned enterprises to shake his father's heart, and decided to allow young people to try. Then returned to the present time, the parents old, but the standard of living go up, parents are very happy, very grateful to the policy of reform and opening. Finally at the end turned a deaf ear, this is the reform and opening up in the story of an ordinary person.

According to the author himself says, this is unfinished essay, on the end of the article hastily handed the child. But the second time I have some time to read this article and fuzzy feel more than the surface so simple. After the teacher commented finished writing I read it again. I probably know. First, the article conflicts with the approach to the performance of young people eager to conflict with the idea of ??reform and opening up state-owned iron rice bowl thought of the older generation. Under many conflicts on the winning side, the young entrepreneur went to Shenzhen, and thus have a happy life now. Chong narrative song can be described as straight bogey, while the conflict is the best way to advance the plot. The second is the article there are many details, such as opening and opening leather Panda black and white TV in the home, as well as the end of the reform and opening up Japanese imports Panasonic 14-inch color TV, which is completely true portrayal of real life, it gives people a natural read sense of substitution, natural to let you overlooked them - because they are inherently background, and only the unexpected will be interesting background.

This reminds me of something. If I write, I feel that unless I have a feeling about this topic, well I will write the narrative. And I do not feel, then, that it is the same as vapid and empty white paper. Although the author himself did not say anything to those details and technique, but I think this is that different people have different reactions to different different scenarios. For the scene feel the same way, some people will unconsciously blood boil up and start gushing about, giving a feeling of glittering; but some people do not reveal much in the same scenario, but this does not mean he did not show affection, perhaps replaced by other ways to show it, such as writing in a diary others can not see what. In this case it comes to a topic - human character and quality. It is personal, from a variety of quality yuan (single quality, such as cautious, careful, etc.) combined. It is this people and this result, was able to make up our rich cultural world. Everyone else just like to get out from the template, and doing things preset to fulfill the destiny that has long given number, like Brave New World, what color to speak of it?

Because of this, the same screen for different people is not the same. Take the reform and opening it. We now have two kinds of people. One is technical, but there are technical people. Very popular in state-owned enterprises because of their superb skills as a country can produce high-quality products, and the other people who are innovative ideas, they do not have technology, but there are a lot of innovation and use, can not be more optimized for various current sound good idea. The two people in a same historical era will be what kind of fate? Before reform and opening up, the former can survive, while the latter is at stake. Because the planned economy does not need so many ordinary people have the idea, on the contrary, it is an urgent need for productivity. But after the reform and opening it? Is now put, we're talking about public entrepreneurship and innovation. This time the former is far less of the latter. Perhaps in the future, with the iterative updating technology, the former technology will be replaced by steel machine. So you see, the same screen for different people is not the same. For me, this comes to the entrance of the moment.

There are people always say, college entrance examination is the most fair selection methods. These words right itself, but it depends on who says it. But no matter who said it, anyway, he is the beneficiary of this system of entrance or potential beneficiaries. Beneficiary, then, obviously, at the national level, can easily select the required talent, and practitioners in this system, it is not to say. As for potential beneficiaries, such as good grades, they almost do not need any opportunity costs will be able to gain a good future; there is the desire to change to change the fate of the child by the parents of this system. Parents unable to bear the cost of changing the destiny, and thus became the only entrance they afford that risk is still small way - as long as children learn better, test a good university, find a good job, get married to make money, to destiny and gradually good walking directions. These are entirely possible, but because of the benefits that they did not enjoy the college entrance examination, but in the future might enjoy, and therefore a potential beneficiary. While the other person, it is the victim of the college entrance examination. I said before, people are different, a lot of things also vary, and very complex. You can not pass a representation to conclude that the nature of this person. In other words you can not learn well the appearance of a person conclude that he is a basket case. Our college entrance examination, it is an attempt to determine a person's quality by evaluating certain aspects. Not just the college entrance examination, in fact, can be said that the moment any attempt to use human subjects to assess the merits of the digital system, are unreasonable. Because a person is an infinite set of possible different meta-quality grouped together into his personality. You can not evaluate the quality of a scene from the personality, and you just can not tell the future person will encounter a scene, so you will not be able identify a person's pros and cons. This is a simple and humble assessment demonstrated the non-human individuals. But we are often able to labeling a person, I think this is based on a trust humans. You trust the system or the system can assess how well a person. People with low test scores is likely to show that he is not good exam, so the work may not be entrusted with the task, which is a considerable probability of things, other small probability events, however there is the same, although the results were not good people such as this, but with a very superior skills. This is something you can not be denied. But you believe that the results are bad people who really difficult entrusted with the task at work, out of your experience and reality, you can see everyone, in reality, most people did. Such trust no problem, there is no such trust, we may fall into an endless chain of suspicion. For example, you can not confirm whether a person is suitable for the job, only to conclude by the actual appointment to visit, but the people who carry out this work must be suitable fit, otherwise it will be some serious consequences (eg high-risk types), which fell into contradiction . To say you have to do knife. You have to cut down trees to make the handle, but cutting down trees need to do first knife, the knife do need to cut down trees - which finished the calf.

So I would say that all of the college entrance examination is not a high school senior. You can pass the college entrance examination to prove your skills, but do not just put your talents restricted entrance. It is full of opportunities and challenges of society, which does not require you how high the level of the particular aspects, the opposite is true, you reach a very high level in any aspect, contribute to society and be able to use it, here enough a. Please think about it, a good but not learn to use knowledge of people, and a knowledge of how much it can make great games (Tencent not say here that are similar opus, minecraft, and called to God no other the classic game) society brought people entertainment options, which do you think would be better to live in the present society? I think it is the latter, even if the former is selected college entrance examination system, but I believe that the state will not choose the former as unproductive as no human values. So in the final analysis, people not in the high and low scores, but added that much value.

Of course, if you more upset, can also Buddha Department of man, not showing off, not hide, fate is up, naturally there will be a value.