"People would rather take care of a bad movie actor of eating and sleeping and trivial, rather than the average person to understand a rough inner world." - I see this sentence on the watercress, because the original sentence can not remember, online check before we realize that this sentence from Lu Yao's "ordinary World," I am what impression did.

Recently, I often glanced glances watercress, but because no attention to a few people, but to look at the recommended content under a variety of topics, most of them are full of literary range of responses, let me ashamed. Although not very interested, but at least valuable than the content of microblogging. I microblogging mechanism is unclear what, under all popular entertainment news, and I have never been concerned about the accounts in this area, or that popular content is the same for all users of it, in short, so I am very disappointed.

Lu Yao for that sentence, and I do not dissent, but also know how much those "people" in psychology. Compared to an ordinary person, a movie actor is undoubtedly more useful for them. Of course, this one has the so-called celebrity, like two cocks, a peacock's tail plug the screen, even if it's not really peacock, will more easily attract people's attention.

Stars can also be seen as a "consumer goods", make the most of interest to ordinary people, not another ordinary life experiences and inner life, but these consumer goods have a sense of distance. No matter what a bad actor acting, some people are still placed in him his own fantasy, and some people will object itself as a vent, and some people just for fun in the crowd. No matter what the situation is, stars are useful for these people, and an ordinary person, perhaps he more capable, more thoughtful, but not on the table become consumer goods, for people there will be no use value .

Useful, it is an important rule in the world of reality, or even the only rule, useful stuff is worth something exists.

I, for one, when I told someone they like reading novels, sometimes encounter this rhetorical question: "Do you see these books what use is it?." For this question, I can not answer. Indeed, I see no use of these books, I do not engage in literature, I see these can not let this paper what I write, do not let me write anything novel, but can not provide any work for me, even a lot of time not like those networks as literature makes me look cool, although I have not seen the network literature.

When I read, never thought about whether the book is useful to me, I do not hold the mentality of entertainment, nor want any knowledge derive, like friends, like, just think to my temperament, my appetite for , so I read this book. Of course, some people will pay a useful friend, but I'm not that kind of person.

However, I can not say that I think the book is useless, though many have forgotten the contents of the novel, but the remaining part, may have infiltrated my soul (if I have this thing then), do not know when it will appear its role. Moreover, if those books are useless, then, probably will not spread to the present.

Useful useless, if just by their own subjective judgment is not convincing, must be transformed into something real, measurable, such as money and the like, in order to convince people of it. Take a look at my book, they bring revenue for authors, publishers brought benefits to, or even brought benefits to scholars, but I did not get any benefits from them, it has been said to be useless It has nothing to refute. As for the spiritual harvest that I, as a consumer of goods from the deserve, and what people crappy movie star a reason to chase, so to say useless reading seems inappropriate.

However, from a practical point of view, of course, it is output as a spiritual person can make money, that is to say, to write articles useful to others. I think those writers at the time of writing a great work, whether with this kind of ideas? We all know the story of "downhill" in the early years of Jiang Yan career flow, heart ANGER, he wrote "Do not Fu" "hate Fu" this classic work, his heart just because of his uneven tolls, not for others write. In his later years, Jiang Yan successful career, generous life, lost the spirit of youth, will not write any good work up.

If only the faithful performance of their inner world, not to think of anything useful useless question, of course, it is also able to write good works. Human emotions, both said to be changing, it can be said static, as one of them, his inner life, there will always arouse sympathy, even if just one person, it should feel satisfied.

When we do something, not to think of useful useless question, this is not too good?