ShuDudu's Home was started in 2011, but the web data is lost, so now begin again, I would like to make some friends, I hope you like ShuDudu's home.
Current position: ShuDudu > Life >

They are also completely naked, why is there such a big difference between foreign countries and domestic countries?

Thursday on January 1st, 1970Life

Recently, apart from the World Cup, the hottest topic online and offline is probably the "naked female anchor public service advertisement" incident.

On June 8, a naked public service advertisement "calling on women to pay attention to their own health" appeared on billboards at major bus stops in urban Changsha. In the advertisement, all three women left the country completely naked, covering only important parts. The three women are Xu Jing, a popular female host of a TV station in Hunan, Chen Dan, the head of a TV station in Changsha, and Lisa, a junior student at the Hunan Institute of Foreign Economics. As soon as the advertisement "went out of the street", there were discussions on the streets of Changsha City for a while.

Transferring a hot post on the Internet does not contain much content, but the issues raised in the post are worth pondering.

Original post: They are also completely naked, why is there such a big difference between foreign countries and domestic countries? [From: Xihai Blog Alliance Community]

1. The

slogan of foreign anti-domestic violence public service advertisements

is: One in four women become victims of domestic violence.

Very visually impactful. The pitiful victim is in sharp contrast to the tape that says "Crime Scene" on his body

. Domestic

[picture hung]

Lisa

[picture hung]

Xu Jing

[picture hung]

Chen Dan

's public service announcement calling on women to pay attention to their own health

3. The comments

are also nude and are also public service announcements. When the two are compared, we can see the difference.

The former, when we look at the picture, we can tell that it is promoting anti-domestic violence. Although it is "completely naked", it does not feel "pornographic" at all.

If the latter is not a public service advertisement, I wonder how many people can see the "public welfare" nature from this "naked" and see that it is "calling on women to pay attention to their own health"?

The key to the question is not whether it is possible to shoot naked advertisements, but how much "public welfare" can everyone see from this "naked"?

If the public cannot see the "public welfare", what is the use of such "public service advertisements"?